Political discussion-Bush vs. Kerry

Fook_Yu · 05-17-2004, 05:57 AM

You can't be serious that you are going to reelect G. Bush.

He cheated himself into presidency.
He sends your counrty men to their deaths with no purpose and under false arguments.
He is hipocrite, chronic lier (above average politician), and has smeared your reputation in the faces of the world.
He lied to your gongress, UN, your partners, refuses testemonies, has the charisma of a baboon....and the intelect for that matter, p0etaeteeoo.
Sended the economy on a roler coster trip increasing prices.
Warning on 9/11 were ignored, etc etc etc

And he will be granted the reward for his doings by another four years of presidency??!!.

*FY is running screaming around the room pulling his hair*

Why? It really doesn't make any sence...

Packetloss · 05-17-2004, 11:36 AM

Depending on who you talk to, he wasn't really 'elected' (A majority is needed to WIN An election)

That said, who do you expect to replace him? John Kerry - Maybe he can share his office with Hanoi Jane, and they can throw medals at all the veterans from the balcony

Fook_Yu · 05-17-2004, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Depending on who you talk to, he wasn't really 'elected' (A majority is needed to WIN An election)

COL

(crying out load)

What is so wrong with John Curry??

No really what is so bad about him?

Horsepower · 05-17-2004, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packetloss

Depending on who you talk to, he wasn't really 'elected' (A majority is needed to WIN An election)

That said, who do you expect to replace him? John Kerry - Maybe he can share his office with Hanoi Jane, and they can throw medals at all the veterans from the balcony

Gore won the popular majority, Bush won the majority of electoral votes. the electoral college voting process is stupid, archaic and should be done away with. the majority of voters in this country did NOT vote for Bush in 2000.

John Kerry is relatively popular with older(Vietnam era and older) veterans. i have no problem with a guy that signed up with intent of trying to do the right thing, went to war and did his tour. after seeing what was really going on there, he changed his mind on the way he felt about it. he felt we shouldn't be there, and as history has shown us, he was right.

btw, he threw his ribbons, not the medals. there is a symbolic difference.

Fook_Yu · 05-17-2004, 03:58 PM

I only hear positive things about this guy. So he stood up for his believes and tried to change something that was unpopular by the general public. That makes him courage’s (doesn’t it?) It takes more guts to do the unpopular then run along in the parade and march towards a massucker. (I believe the decisive Mr Bush decided not to show up, at least that’s what we get on our media).

But I still don’t get whats wrong with J Kerry

And so what if he tosset his golden tractor over a gate (or what they are called) ribbons medals whatever.
A) At least he got them!!
B) Once given they were his, his to decide what to do with them
C) Isn't it american to stand up for your believes (wright/wrong)
D) I'm not saying he was, but you are allowed to be wrong (how old was he?) and tossing a medal over a fence is something totaly different then lying to a 250 mil. population and tricking them into war.
E) "In unity we stand behind the banner" To many people died for free will in WWII to start following a power secking corrupt selfish prick of a Hill Billy that has a IQ in the -100.

Yiiihaaaa

ICEPICK · 05-17-2004, 04:02 PM

Maybe this will help

...

Bonez · 05-17-2004, 04:07 PM

bush dodged draft

kerry joined

who do you think is more qualified to send soldiers over seas somewhere where it's a "you might be shot" it's a "your most likely going to be shot, many times, then hacked into peices"

ICEPICK · 05-17-2004, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonez

bush dodged draft

kerry joined

who do you think is more qualified to send soldiers over seas somewhere

LMAO Clinton dodged the draft... Gore had Bodyguards in Vietnam.....Bush was in the National Guard [a form of Draft dodging I suppose(AKA Weekend Warriors)]..... Kerry did serve in Vietnam...... So by your reasoning Clinton should not have been President.....

Heres witnesess to Bush's National Guard Tour

http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2004/021104.asp

Fook_Yu · 05-17-2004, 04:25 PM

You are sometimes so weak in your arguments. Which one of the two is a sissy:

BUSH
OR
KELLY

ICEPICK · 05-17-2004, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fook_Yu

You are sometimes so lame in your arguments. Which one of the two is a sissy:

BUSH
OR
KELLY

Well seeing how the only Kelly in the news here in the states is R.Kelly How about saying KERRY JOHN KERRY

& by your reasoning Clinton is a sissy too yet YOU EURO's love him